![]() What I am really curious about is what this looks like for other people. Buy MTG over 12.87, target 13.46, Stop Loss 12.83 Details If 12.87 begins to break higher, the technical summary data tells us to buy MTG just over 12.87, with an upside target of 13.46. This prevents a headache because listing every single Commander precon and Secret Lair would be painful for everyone involved. I’m only counting sets as those that came with booster packs. Here's a screenshot of what my symbol editor looks like: /Hk4LTEO.pngĪnd here is the 369x369 black and white image that I am importing: /Hk4MAhu.png Depending on how you count ‘em up there are roughly 140 MTG sets out there if you exclude supplemental sets like Commander decks, Duel Decks, etc. But why it would do this is beyond me - it seems like an odd design decision and suggests that I am doing something wrong. are able to utilize magic, the use of rituals, symbols, action, gestures. It feels like the Commons use the inside boundary, not including the white border while Uncommon and above use the outside boundary, including the white border. With several sets having featured Dragon tribal cards (including the recently. ![]() ![]() Specifically, when you create a set symbol in the symbol editor, each shape has a white outline-border. Of these, the bottom-right symbol (the MSE uncommon) appears to be " fatter" than the others, but I'm not sure why. The two symbols on the bottom (also common and uncommon) are what I see in MSE from the imported PNG image. In my screenshot, the two symbols on top (common and uncommon) were taken from high-resolution scans of cards in my cube. Boxed sets, each consisting of a pair of 60-card decks built around a rivalry between two planeswalkers or tribes. ![]() ![]() Indeed, the symbol looks perfect when selected as a Common (black). I then import it into the set symbol editor, which also seems to work correctly. I created a 369x369 square PNG image entirely black & white of the set symbol according to the documentation here. Since I'm seeking clarification about usage, I put it here - if that's incorrect, I'd be obliged if the question could moved to the appropriate section.Īs for the issue itself, perhaps my screenshot isn't clear enough, so I'll try to elaborate a bit. Development struck me as being intended for source-code / scripting / templates as an author whereas the Design sections stuck me as being for issues encountered as a user. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |